<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Land Bank Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valleyfutures.net/2008/06/12/land-bank-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valleyfutures.net/2008/06/12/land-bank-proposal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Johnson</title>
		<link>http://valleyfutures.net/2008/06/12/land-bank-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valleyfutures.net/?p=90#comment-8</guid>
		<description>As far as I can see in the Mad River valley we have been talking about real housing for 20+ years.  I would like to suggest that it is the regulatory bodies that are  stopping the process. If each town committed to giving a permit within 6 months of wining a contest to the best affordable housing proposal with a minimum of 25 units for each town, 50 to 75 would be more desired and then we would get somewhere. Have a contest over the next year and the town back the winner, GO TO COURT FOR THE PROPOSAL IF NECESSARY, stand up for it in act 250 etc and you might get somewhere.  There are so many NYMBY&#039;s, it&#039;s tough to get things through.  

Just think if someone tired to do Hiddenwood, Spring hill today, it would be impossible. For affordability we need something with densities much heavier than this. There is an excellent example of this just outside of Williston. Great looking neighbor hood, really a class act and for those worried about visual impact you really can&#039;t see it from the road. It&#039;s something you&#039;d be proud to live in and actually own it.

NYMBY&quot;S, look what&#039;s going on in Moretown. Parcel of land was zoned for certain things now neighbors and town officials are playing dirty pool and changing the rules.... we&#039;ll still bring in gravel on the same roads, its just going to cost us more.

So many proposals seem to be glorifed rental housing where the owners really never build any equity. These are needed too, but let&#039;s call a spade a spade, it&#039;s a rental property and we need more good propertieds.  If the town also did the same contest for multifamily housing units within town there would be more good rental properties also. 

The towns people could vote on the projects at town meeting. That way the residents would get what they want. 

I think Habitat&#039;s done the most, 2 homes that I know of.  Having an approved plan would make more sense to me than doing this onsie, twosie type thing.

Finding the money for a project won&#039;t be too hard. Getting a permit....that&#039;s reasonable, that&#039;s the trick.

Sincerely,

Neil Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can see in the Mad River valley we have been talking about real housing for 20+ years.  I would like to suggest that it is the regulatory bodies that are  stopping the process. If each town committed to giving a permit within 6 months of wining a contest to the best affordable housing proposal with a minimum of 25 units for each town, 50 to 75 would be more desired and then we would get somewhere. Have a contest over the next year and the town back the winner, GO TO COURT FOR THE PROPOSAL IF NECESSARY, stand up for it in act 250 etc and you might get somewhere.  There are so many NYMBY&#8217;s, it&#8217;s tough to get things through.  </p>
<p>Just think if someone tired to do Hiddenwood, Spring hill today, it would be impossible. For affordability we need something with densities much heavier than this. There is an excellent example of this just outside of Williston. Great looking neighbor hood, really a class act and for those worried about visual impact you really can&#8217;t see it from the road. It&#8217;s something you&#8217;d be proud to live in and actually own it.</p>
<p>NYMBY&#8221;S, look what&#8217;s going on in Moretown. Parcel of land was zoned for certain things now neighbors and town officials are playing dirty pool and changing the rules&#8230;. we&#8217;ll still bring in gravel on the same roads, its just going to cost us more.</p>
<p>So many proposals seem to be glorifed rental housing where the owners really never build any equity. These are needed too, but let&#8217;s call a spade a spade, it&#8217;s a rental property and we need more good propertieds.  If the town also did the same contest for multifamily housing units within town there would be more good rental properties also. </p>
<p>The towns people could vote on the projects at town meeting. That way the residents would get what they want. </p>
<p>I think Habitat&#8217;s done the most, 2 homes that I know of.  Having an approved plan would make more sense to me than doing this onsie, twosie type thing.</p>
<p>Finding the money for a project won&#8217;t be too hard. Getting a permit&#8230;.that&#8217;s reasonable, that&#8217;s the trick.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Neil Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Plummer</title>
		<link>http://valleyfutures.net/2008/06/12/land-bank-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Plummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valleyfutures.net/?p=90#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I like a lot of these ideas, John.  I&#039;m wondering where a discussion about affordable cohousing might fit in this picture?  There are 2 or 3 cohousing projects happening in Chittenden County, and they include at least some low-income units.  Maybe something to look into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like a lot of these ideas, John.  I&#8217;m wondering where a discussion about affordable cohousing might fit in this picture?  There are 2 or 3 cohousing projects happening in Chittenden County, and they include at least some low-income units.  Maybe something to look into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

