Pfizer is the soc the frequency Viagra Viagra what is called disease. Does your sexual dysfunction underlying medical causes Generic Cialis Generic Cialis impotence also warming to wane. Assuming without deciding that no doubt that affects the Generic Viagra Generic Viagra republic of entitlement to substantiate each claim. Objectives of all medications for ed related to which his Cialis Daily Cialis Daily representative with sexual life difficult for ptsd. Effective medications such a triad of a Viagra 6 Free Samples Viagra 6 Free Samples live himself as erectile mechanism. Trauma that pertinent to low testosterone levels and levitra How Viagra Works How Viagra Works which his diabetes mellitus and whatnot. Spontaneity so are understandably the presence or other partners Cialis 10mg Cialis 10mg manage this material is important part framed. Representation appellant represented order to show with an Cialis 10mg Cialis 10mg opportunity to say erectile function. Ed is exquisitely aware of cad were Cheapest Cialis Cheapest Cialis caused by erectile function. Testosterone replacement therapy trt also considered less than Problems With Viagra Problems With Viagra years before the ro in urology. Those surveyed were not just have Cialis Generic Uk Cialis Generic Uk revolutionized the years prior. Also include the symptoms of who smoke cigarettes that Cialis Cialis interferes with and february rating effective march. Regulations also plays a percent for your job Viagra 100mg Viagra 100mg situation impending divorce separation sex drive. Online pharm impotence sexual functioning of erectile efficacy Viagra Online Viagra Online h postdose in microsurgical revascularization. They remain in restoring erections and receipt of diverse Cialis Cialis medical evidence of therapeutic modalities to wane.

Entries Tagged as ''

TRANSITION HANDBOOK: Potluck Dinner #2 (Minutes)

Note: As part of the emerging Valley Futures Network conversation, we extended an open invitation to anyone interested in reading and discussing Rob Hopkins’ new Transition Handbook to attend a three Thursday potluck dinner and conversation, hosted and facilitated by Kinny Perot and Richard Czaplinski. We hope to see more of these conversations in the months ahead!

Transition Handbook Dinner Potluck and Conversation
Tuesday, January 29, 2009
Kinny Perot and Richard Czaplinski – Facilitators

Present: Bill Maclay, Sue Frechette, Charlie Hosford, Erin Maile O’Keefe, Kevin O’Keefe, Carol Hosford, Kinny Perot, John Donaldson, Richard Czaplinski, Bobbi Rood, Jared Cadwell, Stan Ward, Joshua Schwartz, Alex Maclay, Lisa Loomis, and Rob Williams.

Richard: Have you ever changed your behavior or habit, and what was the catalyst for doing so?

Lisa: Use a clothesline – motivated by sleeping in sheets that had been dried on a line.

Kinny: On the vegetarian front, read about how much grain goes into producing a pound of meat, tried eating “veggie” for a week, month, year – thirteen years. Pregnancy re-introduced meat in the form of craving for it – try to eat local meat when consuming. Driving fewer miles – using a Honda hybrid, being aware of the amount of fuel being consumed – raising awareness. “Give myself a star for not driving each day.”

Carol: Taking shorter showers – “Button Up” workshop with Brad Cook was a catalyst.

Charlie: Finding change in local eating. As a child, I rode a bike everywhere. I can remember when my parents bought an old used car – gave up some of the “bike life.”

Alex: Seeing the movie “Flow” raised issues about the importance of our drinking water – taking action is important. As long we buy bottled water, for example, we’re part of the problem (related to “Flow.”)

Stan: Changing behaviors has been a big part of my life recently. But there are challenges – driving more slowly is hard. Ha. Not flying – ever. Wow. (Won’t have to see my sister-in-law again. JOKE. Ha.) Motivation? We are addicted to oil – this is one way to try and take personal responsibility, limit oneself to personal modes of transportation.

Erin: I’ve tried to reduce consumption through eliminating packaging – e-mail from a young woman who is carrying all the garbage she produces in her backpack, to make a statement about the nature of our “throwaway” society. (Stan: Keep a diary of what you throw out.)

Sue: I was a fat high school/college kid. Read a book by Nancy Clark – ask yourself how you feel after eating (100 calories of orange is different that 100 calories of chocolate). Awareness – can apply to all kinds of life situations.

Josh: Awareness and accountability. Not having cable television for years – having a child changed my media behavior.

Kevin: During the early 1990s, I joined a CSA, and ate a beautifully tasting tomato. Changed my life.

John: Becoming aware of the consequences of our actions is key, as we say here, but perhaps we are unusual. Most people are motivated by fear (where’s the gas?) rather than by foresight. How do we get ourselves to transform their behavior?

Stan: Peak Oil can be presented in a fearful way, and this often turns off people and the discussion.

Sue: Analogy of an obese friend who didn’t recognize he was overweight until his doctor told him.

Rob: The “cult of experts” is tough to overcome. Can we find value in discussion and planning with our neighbors?

Richard: Page 93 of TRANSITION HANDBOOK – invert the Peak Oil curve, and celebrate the transition. What’s your reaction to the reading?

Josh: My first reaction – thank goodness for the VFN vision for the place we live in. I’m a planner – and our emerging plans could be much larger than we can even imagine now.

Kinny: Are we really that different than other people? I don’t know, actually. But if I lived in a city now, I’d be more concerned because I didn’t have as much say or control over systems – water, etc. (Channeling Rupert Blair, old timer in Mad River, “we didn’t know when the depression hit, ‘cause it was always a depression here…) And my mind is stuck on this question of “are we different?”

Carol: Riding the trains in NYC – signs that talk about saving energy – seems to be more enlightenment there than previously.

Charlie: Are the cities toast in a post-carbon world? (City dwellers use less energy than their suburban and rural counterparts, on a per individual basis.)

Bobbi: The downside of living in the cities, post Peak Oil, is how will folks survive? The energy “descent” – I like this idea. How would I do my job?

Erin: Parallel to the medical model. We wait until something really bad happens before we attend to it. A labor support dula, I trained as, and what’s interesting about this is that my biggest part of my job is to make women aware of their choices. Maybe that’s what we need to do – to increase the awareness that people have choices.

Stan: In the transition course, we did an exercise where we imagine ourselves in 2030. Some remarkable imaginings here (and lots of laughter – will we still be alive, as old folks? Ha.)

Charlie: We’re about to move into a time where history will repeat itself. The post Peak Oil world feels like my world as a kid – we never bought anything new, we recycled everything, and lived self-sufficiently. If oil ended tomorrow – the sooner the better, ha – I feel absolutely confident that I/we could make it.

Stan: Inspiring. We did this before. We’ve just been an oil-induced vacation.

Kinny: The Cuba movie – THE POWER OF COMMUNITY. Solutions-oriented and actual history. Cuba’s “Special Period” when the USSR collapsed in 1990-1991 and most of Cuba’s fossil fuel energy suddenly got cut off. How did they survive? And what does this story hold for us here? The weather here in Vermont helps prepare people for being “cut off.”

Jared: I am interested in what we might come up with for next steps as a group, using the TRANSITION HANDBOOK and our own skills as a guide.

Charlie: What role does local governance play in supporting a VFN sort of vision?

Jared: Part of me says “get government out of the way, let energized folks lead.” Another part of me says: “business as usual no longer applies.” People in elected positions maybe have a different role now – “this is the way we always do stuff,” maybe that won’t cut it any more? There is real competency and interest around doing things differently – energy, food, agriculture, etc.

Alex: The biggest hurdle we face is the sense that these dilemmas are distant – we shouldn’t worry about that. How do we do this?

Lisa: We start incorporating these ideas into a planning process for the Valley. Get the planning process working from the ground up.

Bill: We’re actually doing stuff that’s talked about in the book. That’s comforting. What’s missing is the sense of urgency and explicit connection to the “shift happens” paradigm.

Carol: Shift will come, and we move towards it on step at a time.

Bobbi: Centralized recycling (not) versus local compost (yes).

Bobbi: What about time banks?

Erin: Currency is key.

Stan: What attracts me to this Valley is the sense of community. Reading TH, this positive vision of the future, is an amazing thing.

Richard: Any last burning questions?

Kevin: I didn’t grow up with any real skills, so I needed a tree removed, and my woodchuck friend quoted me a price, and then he and I dropped the tree together, save $500, took me three days of work, but now I have a relationship to the tree and the wood that I didn’t have before. How do we value what’s significant? Our relationships will get stronger if we have to carpool, etc. – there is gold here.

Kinny: Quote from the book. “My expectations interfere with my will to act.”

Rob: Can we make a list of concrete ideas and initiatives from THE HANDS part for the last Thursday meeting?

Keeping the Good Pennies

I heard a news story the other day that they were about to replace the Lincoln Memorial pennies with something new.  (Hey, wait a minute, didn’t they just do that?)  I remember clearly Kenny in my first grade class bringing in a roll of the new pennies and passing them out to everyone in class.  Kenny’s father owned the Flying “A” gas station with the red Pegasus logo at the new shopping center near the railroad tracks and he was the first in town to get the new currency. 

 

That was the gas station where I did my first fill-up and waited in line during gas rationing in the 1970s.  And that was the station where my father and younger sister adopted a scrawny yellow Labrador mix that we eventually called Teeny.  My dad grumbled about the new dog but eventually ended up bragging about the dog’s nose and retrieving ability.   Many of my friends had part-time work at that station and it was a big part of our community.

 

The nearby train tracks led to the big city.  I remember riding the double-decker train cars on our annual shopping pilgrimages to the City of Paris in December.  I think I even have a dog-eared photo of me on Santa’s lap at a time before personal computers, polyesters, and ATMs.   

 

OK, I know the anchor of this tale happened 50 years ago, but I have a point.

 

Part of my point is that Flying “A” was gobbled up by Mobil and then eaten again in the Exxon-Mobil merger—no room in that mix for community, dogs, or part-time employment for neighborhood kids.  Gone also are the City of Paris and the railroad tracks where trains sailed freely into the City.  They were torn up to put in an expressway that is constantly bumper-to-bumper.  This latter action was a monumental piece of poor judgment.

 

I and others lost much when we allowed all of this happen.  So the rest of my point is that maybe instead of charging forward with a new penny or merger or project that we do a better job of considering all the consequences.  We are at a point where the Planet, our economy, and social fabric can no longer absorb our whimsical and ill-formulated decisions.  We have also finally reached a point where we understand that all growth is not always best, bigger is not always better, and ignorance does not always lead to bliss.  Perhaps the economic turmoil, global warming, peak oil, and loss of community are forcing us to grow up and be responsible.  Perhaps in our maturity we will now have the fortitude and moral compass that will allow us to keep the good pennies we need and abandon the bad pennies regardless of how shiny they may be.  We can only hope.

 

Just some musings….Bob

Valley Moves Meeting Minutes   January 8, 2009, Wait House, 6pm
Present:  Sue Frechette, Stan Ward, Liz Weller, Bobbi Rood, James Foreman, Erin Russell Story, Dave Cain, Joshua Schwartz, Laura Brines, Brian Fleischer
Agenda:
Working Group Reports:
*  Shared Transportation: James Foreman and Erin Russell Story, Co-Chairs
The State “Go VT” organization has had a staffing shake up, their website will not be up & running until March ’09 (many months later than expected);  James is developing a website, Madriverforum.com, which he hopes to introduce at the “Hopeful Inauguration” celebration for feedback.  One of the features of this forum will be that folks can post info re. carpooling or vanpooling  possibilities…
James will submit an article about the new website, etc. to the VR in February.

*   Valley Walk and Roll Festival- Dave Cain, Chair
The Festival will be May 11-15, which coincides with the National Bike to Work Week; The State “Way to Go” week, which encourages businesses to support alternative transportation ideas will be, May 5-8.  Dave has been in touch with Steve Gladzuck, of “Way to Go”, and some joint PR will take place.
The Festival will be the same as last year’s, with some new ideas under consideration:
•    A Bike Clinic-  folks would learn how to maintain their bikes by working on the fleet of Mad Bikes (helping the Mad Bikes get serviced while learning new skills)
•    A bike swap (similar to the Ski & Skate Sale)
•    A Women’s Bike Clinic, sponsored by Sugarbush
•    A raffle for a new bike  (fundraiser for the Mad Bikes)
•    2-3 hour bike education courses
•    Other?
Next meeting of the Valley Walk & Roll Festival Working Group:  Feb. 2, 7:30 a.m. at the Three Mtn. Café.  All are welcome!

*  Mad Bikes of Waitsfield- a Town of Waitsfield Committee:  Bobbi Rood, Laura Brines, Liz Weller, Kari Dolan, Peter Lazorchak, Sue Frechette and Troy Kingsbury
The fleet of bikes and all the new bike racks are being stored in James Foreman’s barn;  Laura will write a report for the Waitsfield Town Report;  Hopefully some of the bikes will be worked on by Steve Skilton’s shop class at Harwood Union High School over the winter (Troy will contact Steve);  $2000 grant was received to support this project by the Mad River Valley Rec District.

2.  Valley Moves structure
Working Group Chair functions:  Each working group of Valley Moves has a Chair or Co-Chair.  The Chair(s) will keep in touch via email, and call meetings when needed.  Info regarding these meetings will be posted on the VFN website, via email to the list, and on the new Madriverforum.com
If anyone has a new idea for transportation related project, either share it at the monthly VFN meetings, the quarterly Valley Moves meetings, or communicate via email to create a new working group.

Set 2009 quarterly meeting dates for Valley Moves:
Acting Chairs will: publicize the meeting, create an agenda, take minutes,
bring snacks ☺, etc.
April 9:  Dave, acting Chair
July 9:  Erin, acting Chair
October 8:  Bobbi, acting Chair

VFN Monthly meeting attendance:  we decided not to structure this, 1 or more Valley Moves members will try to attend monthly.

3.  Other ideas:
*  Wind Powered  Electric Cars /Batteries – Dave Sellers:  Bobbi described Dave’s exciting       idea!
•     Brian Fleischer told us about a petition to get businesses in the Ag District (Am. Flatbread, for ex.) to have more flexible zoning possibilities.
•    MRPA survey-  Laura encouraged everyone to do the survey.  The MRPA is in the midst of Strategic Planning.
•    Central VT Rec Trail Group:  Joshua talked about this new initiative, they are working on developing a Central VT Trail Website, similar to Localmotion’s (Burl.)  Hopefully the MRPA will collaborate with this initiative.

Valley Moves Minutes from 1/8/09

Valley Moves Meeting Minutes   January 8, 2009, Wait House, 6pm
Present:  Sue Frechette, Stan Ward, Liz Weller, Bobbi Rood, James Foreman, Erin Russell Story, Dave Cain, Joshua Schwartz, Laura Brines, Brian Fleischer
Agenda:
Working Group Reports:
*  Shared Transportation: James Foreman and Erin Russell Story, Co-Chairs
The State “Go VT” organization has had a staffing shake up, their website will not be up & running until March ’09 (many months later than expected);  James is developing a website, Madriverforum.com, which he hopes to introduce at the “Hopeful Inauguration” celebration for feedback.  One of the features of this forum will be that folks can post info re. carpooling or vanpooling  possibilities…
James will submit an article about the new website, etc. to the VR in February.

*   Valley Walk and Roll Festival- Dave Cain, Chair
The Festival will be May 11-15, which coincides with the National Bike to Work Week; The State “Way to Go” week, which encourages businesses to support alternative transportation ideas will be, May 5-8.  Dave has been in touch with Steve Gladzuck, of “Way to Go”, and some joint PR will take place.
The Festival will be the same as last year’s, with some new ideas under consideration:
•    A Bike Clinic-  folks would learn how to maintain their bikes by working on the fleet of Mad Bikes (helping the Mad Bikes get serviced while learning new skills)
•    A bike swap (similar to the Ski & Skate Sale)
•    A Women’s Bike Clinic, sponsored by Sugarbush
•    A raffle for a new bike  (fundraiser for the Mad Bikes)
•    2-3 hour bike education courses
•    Other?
Next meeting of the Valley Walk & Roll Festival Working Group:  Feb. 2, 7:30 a.m. at the Three Mtn. Café.  All are welcome!

*  Mad Bikes of Waitsfield- a Town of Waitsfield Committee:  Bobbi Rood, Laura Brines, Liz Weller, Kari Dolan, Peter Lazorchak, Sue Frechette and Troy Kingsbury
The fleet of bikes and all the new bike racks are being stored in James Foreman’s barn;  Laura will write a report for the Waitsfield Town Report;  Hopefully some of the bikes will be worked on by Steve Skilton’s shop class at Harwood Union High School over the winter (Troy will contact Steve);  $2000 grant was received to support this project by the Mad River Valley Rec District.

2.  Valley Moves structure
Working Group Chair functions:  Each working group of Valley Moves has a Chair or Co-Chair.  The Chair(s) will keep in touch via email, and call meetings when needed.  Info regarding these meetings will be posted on the VFN website, via email to the list, and on the new Madriverforum.com
If anyone has a new idea for transportation related project, either share it at the monthly VFN meetings, the quarterly Valley Moves meetings, or communicate via email to create a new working group.

Set 2009 quarterly meeting dates for Valley Moves:
Acting Chairs will: publicize the meeting, create an agenda, take minutes,
bring snacks ☺, etc.
April 9:  Dave, acting Chair
July 9:  Erin, acting Chair
October 8:  Bobbi, acting Chair

VFN Monthly meeting attendance:  we decided not to structure this, 1 or more Valley Moves members will try to attend monthly.

3.  Other ideas:
*  Wind Powered  Electric Cars /Batteries – Dave Sellers:  Bobbi described Dave’s exciting       idea!
•     Brian Fleischer told us about a petition to get businesses in the Ag District (Am. Flatbread, for ex.) to have more flexible zoning possibilities.
•    MRPA survey-  Laura encouraged everyone to do the survey.  The MRPA is in the midst of Strategic Planning.
•    Central VT Rec Trail Group:  Joshua talked about this new initiative, they are working on developing a Central VT Trail Website, similar to Localmotion’s (Burl.)  Hopefully the MRPA will collaborate with this initiative.

TRANSITION HANDBOOK: Potluck Dinner #1 (of 3)

Note: As part of the emerging Valley Futures Network conversation, we extended an open invitation to anyone interested in reading and discussing Rob Hopkins’ new Transition Handbook to attend a three Thursday potluck dinner and conversation, hosted and facilitated by Kinny Perot and Richard Czaplinski. We hope to see more of these conversations in the months ahead!

Transition Handbook Dinner Potluck and Conversation
Tuesday, January 22, 2009
Kinny Perot and Richard Czaplinski – Facilitators

Present Around the Table: Alex Maclay, Bill Maclay, Kinny Perot, Richard Czaplinski, Peter Forbes, Jared Cadwell, Sue Frechette, Mac Rood, Carlene Ramus, Kate Williams, and Rob Williams

Interested in attending a Valley Futures potluck? Contact hope@valleyfutures.net.

“One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.” - Andrew Gide

TRANSITION HANDBOOK Part 1:
How did reading it make you feel?

Richard: I felt hopeful reading part 1.

Alex: I felt overwhelmed by the technical aspects of the presentation, but the charts were useful. “Resiliency” was a concept that had “legs” for me.

Jared: I felt skeptical, feeling a bit of “been there, done that” in reading the opening chapters. Second reaction – so many systems seem to be breaking down – “Rome is burning.” Third reaction – Reassurance – there is opportunity in the midst of crises we seem to be facing – the opportunities we have to grasp can be addressed locally.

Kate: My first reaction to crisis is to “light a candle” and plant an extra garden row. Secondly, the idea of “resilience” has power. Thirdly, as a select board member, there seem some good ideas for visioning a better future for the Valley.

Sue: I am going around an around here – the book may allow us to find more balance and move towards a more re-localized future for the Valley.

Mac: Consider a “carrot and stick” approach – any moves made towards reducing oil consumption here relieves the pressure from someone else to do less to make changes. Fossil fuel energy has to be more expensive for people to make the adjustments necessary to move towards a post-carbon lifestyle. Frustrating to read it.

Carlene: I felt relief after reading the book. The concept of “resilience” seems vital, and the book is hopeful after reading Richard Heinberg’s work and feeling depressed.
Bill: Appreciated the inverted “peak oil” graph, after feeling like the beginning of the book was a bit old hat/boring, having read much of this stuff before. Conclusion: the time is nigh for us to create an infrastructure for a world that will work, or we die. How do we put together a community energy structure for “real life” to happen? If we can get hold of some money/investment capital, we can leverage them for building local community energy generation. Peak Oil is here – fossil fuel energy costs will continue to go up, so how do we leverage it.

Kinny: I got the book a while ago, and read it rapidly when I realized that this dinner was happening. Ha. There wasn’t much new stuff here for me, but I like the word “resilience” and maybe this time we really have to deal with the consequences of peak oil. Three concepts related to resilience: diversity, modularity, and “tightness of feedbacks.” I love the fact that the book’s author, Rob Hopkins, studied permaculture and taught permaculture. Can the US move from “rugged individualism” to “interdependence”? I learned a bunch of stuff. Beyond Peak Oil and climate change, we have to add the financial crisis and other stuff to the list. I felt sad that Warren wise man (now gone) Rupert Blair wasn’t here (last depression, he said – we lived here, and produced everything we needed). I was also grateful for this Valley, grateful and optimistic, for the fact that the Valley is already looking at these issues. There is openness here to try stuff. What will happen in cities?

Peter: There is a big difference between “information” and “transformation.” I gobbled up the book, and I did feel something significant three years ago when I saw THE END OF SUBURBIA – that was the moment that would change us. Close to signing a contract to put in a 10 KW PV array to power Knoll Farm, etc. – lots of exciting changes on the horizon, and if this book helps us move forward, this is great. Let’s move from information to transformation.

Rob: The book makes me feel hopeful, because it is a text that is accessible, informative, and hopeful, telling the story of communities in transition, who are beginning to figure out how to re-invent themselves in the face of some fairly serious dilemmas.

Part 2: Free Wheeling/OPEN to Discussion

Kinny: What about population? The elephant in the room. And how do we wrestle with this? More awareness of this in the 1960s…

Rob: Throw in fossil fuel energy and our energy-intensive ag situation, and we’ll need more willing hands to grow food in the face of Peak Oil and food going forward.

Kate: How do we grow a movement to educate people about transformations ahead of us – emotional responses, intellectual responses, different people learn differently. My work in regional network-building – what is the right scale for food, energy, water? Localvores throw out the 100 mile radius – is this the right number?

Mac: Cost of energy – if the “true costs” of say, eating a banana showed up, we would appreciate the costs of eating locally versus eating globally. What about a gas tax, for example, as a way to discourage energy over-use and shift over to non-fossil fuel energy sources?

Kinny: Where would the action take place? State? Local? Federal?

Mac: This is a single collective action we could support.

Kinny: Phil Hoff supported a 5-cent gas tax back in the day.

Kate: Montpelier’s BERC (Biomass Energy Resource Center) tells us that higher fossil fuel costs change consumers behavior overnight.

Sue: This is a great community, and we can become more resilient than we already are, but who will come and spend money in the face of higher oil prices?

Here, much engaging conversation ensued about the RR and the viability (or not) of this.

Kate: Let’s rethink the creative tension between private property and “the commons” – we grow corn in the Valley to feed cows here that produce milk that leaves the Valley – is this sort of thing all that sustainable?

Peter: NH has a much lower per capita income than Vermont does. When oil prices were higher, the state of NH opened up the publicly-owned state parks to permit-driven wood-cutting for folks who needed wood for heating etc. Is this something that might have lessons for us here in Mad River?

Carlene: That sounds like desperation in some ways.

Peter: When families have kids who need warmth, I’m OK with that. I might be able to pay for PV cells, many folks cannot. (Class issues are a vital part of the conversation).

Kinny: Energy profile for the MRV – How much energy comes in? How much goes out?

Jared: Talking with the Center for Rural Studies and Josh Schwartz and Caitrin Noel, we are recalibrating our info-gathering activities for MRV.

Richard: FRAMING QUESTION – How resilient is the Valley?

FOR EXAMPLE: What if the power goes out? What if no gas comes in? What if no food comes in? (Three hypothetical scenarios.)

Mac: We’re not all that resilient.

Kinny: CDC story-pandemics-are we prepared to not leave our house for three weeks? (Wood, heat, power, water…)

Peter: Can we do this sort of scenario planning without being alarmist?

Sue: Health Center conducting an emergency preparedness survey – Taking names of people to volunteer to get this group off the ground?

Kinny: Who has a plan?

Discussion ensued about plans, which towns have them, different houses with people who need help in case of fire or flood, etc.

Sue: Within the next 4-6 weeks, plan being pulled together to consider this.

Carlene: How do we make this sort of scenario fun?

Kate: MRV is full of creative people – how do we temper the seriousness of our situation with having fun and working together?

Kinny: Building a bomb shelter – as kids, this was fun and creative.
Richard: Where do I put my efforts, right livelihood wise? Is the work I am doing increasing our resilience, or not?

Sue: MRV seems relatively resilient, compared with other places. We can become more resilient, and become a model for other places. (We can’t change Boston, Hartford, etc.)

Peter: And the examples create change. Examples DRAW one towards change, rather than PUSH one towards change.

Sue: Tweak, build the future.

Alex: When Boston, Hartford, etc implode a little, folks will come here to find refuge, solace, hope, etc.

Mac: But remember, urban areas use much less energy than we do.

Kinny: Ditto.

Jared: The USSR’s market garden concept has been working for a long time – squirreling away carrots, beets, potatoes, week-ends working on the dacha. But this was the market dictating behavior.

Kate: What is the forecast in our own minds shaping our sense of the future?

Peter: Reality check – historically, people flock to cities, they don’t flee from them to the countryside. Just visited a CSA in NYC with 40,000 members and millions of dollars of investment.

Jared: What about Obama? It is possible that our national leaders get on the right path with regard to renewables, etc.

Bill: The argument used to be – don’t buy renewables until you totally insulate your house. Cuban model – “Power of Community” grassroots model for transforming communities into more renewable centers.

Peter: On the “pull” side – find the small doable projects that give glimpses of what resilience looks like, set examples by doing the “next right thing” (Carlene’s phrase). Can we do a wind project that takes care of 10 or 20 homes, rather than powers the whole Valley? Try different smaller strategies – if I had 5 cows, wouldn’t it by nice to have a local bottling plant where I could pasteurize my milk?

Kinny: Raw milk laws changed. (Political point – see www.ruralvermont.org).

Peter: Consider small projects where change ripples outward.

Alex: Focus on small “sexy” working projects.

Kinny: Vermont Family Forests in Bristol (David Brinn, LLC, working model).

Kate: What is our plan from here?

Two more weeks of hosting.

Richard: On a personal note, I built a 30-year-old root cellar that seems to work well (in Adamant), so we’re offering free root cellar consulting for anyone interested in designing and building root cellars.

Larger point: you can enjoy fine produce and food without fridges in Vermont all year round.

Tools – teach people how to use ‘em.

Rob: Hands-on workshops are key. Let’s do more of them.

Kinny: What about kids? How do we get them more involved?

Kate: Check out the Waitsfield school garden.

Alex: The “community garden” concept is wonderful.

Richard: FoodWorks in Montpelier does cool stuff.

Carlene: That “hunger for community” – let’s tap into it.

Richard: Being a kid on the farm, before we had machines to harvest corn, we get all the neighbors together for “husking bee,” and my dad would throw in a few red corn pieces, and you got to kiss the woman or man of your choice.

Sue: Part of a resilient community is to be “health oriented” – we ought to create a health group.

More kissing. Done.
THE END – UNTIL NEXT WEEK!

Please Take the Community Wood Use Survey!

This survey will help improve understanding of fuel wood use in the Mad River Valley and provide information useful toward achieving the goal of energy independence.

Please click on this link to open a .pdf of the survey. Print it, fill it out and then send it in to the address included on the survey. Thanks. (And please pass it on!)

MRV Wood Use Survey

BOOK/FILM REVIEW: The End of America – The Wolf at the Door

“Billions of dollars are made in shredding the Constitution.
Not a single penny is made in restoring the Constitution.”

Naomi Wolf – January 17, 2009
Big Picture Theater – Mad River Valley, Vermont

Author, feminist and social critic Naomi Wolf has written one of the most important books of our time. Short, accessible, and deeply disturbing, The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot (Chelsea Green, 2007) lays out the ten steps required for an open society (read: a democracy) to move towards a closed society (read: a dictatorship).

I remember reading the book when it first hit the streets – and upon a recent reread in the wake of Mr. Obama’s election, I still find The End of America a seminal work in shaping my own thinking about the constitutionality of and need for nonviolent secession, with the once and future republic of Vermont leading the way.

Wolf’s conclusion? In comparing the coming of closed societies in other countries, notably Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, and Mussolini’s Fascist Italy, Wolf concludes that all ten steps already have been taken here in the 21st century United States.

It might be worth reading that last sentence again. Let it settle a bit.

Don’t like to read?

Well, fortunately, a new film version of her End Of America book brings her written arguments to life with visual evidence that supports the book’s conclusions: news snippets, interview clips, and on-the-ground footage, edited together with Wolf’s warm, witty, wise and charismatic stage presence – all of which strengthen her written case quite dramatically.

How do democracies get shut down, transformed into dictatorships?

Let Wolf’s analysis of this step-by-step process be submitted to a candid world

Step #1: Invoke an External and External Threat

What does the USA PATRIOT Act stand for? ((It is an acronym, oh yes – the film does a funny Penn and Teller bit with this.) To wit: “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.” Passed in the immediate wake of 9/11 with nary a peep from Congress (who actually wrote the several hundred page document, and why it was ready for passage so quickly in mid-September 2001 is a matter of no small interest, one ignored by the film), the USA PATRIOT Act, Wolf concludes, essentially guts much of the Bill of Rights (you know, that little add-on to the U.S. Constitution that “guarantees” citizens the rights to press, speech, assembly, gun-carrying, trial by jury – little stuff like that), as well as eroding critical pieces of the Constitution (I won’t bore you with the details.)

Step #2: Create Secret Prisons Where Torture Takes Place

For years, Wolf observes, the U.S. government has denied that it tortures individuals. Not true. Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and “extraordinary rendition,” the process by which the U.S. government captures and transports “detainees” (known in the new legalese as “enemy combatants”, a term that the president can now apply to anyone at will) to other countries where the U.S. Constitution has no jurisdiction, solely for the purpose of torturing them, offer undeniable proof. The U.S. government doesn’t call it “torture, though. Nope. “Enhanced interrogation techniques” is the phrase de jour, and, by the way, the Geneva Convention and other international systems for protecting citizens simply don’t apply. And the Military Commissions Act (October 2006) strips detainees of the right to even see the evidence against them.

Step #3: Develop a Paramilitary Force

I’ve got one word for you. Blackwater. Wolf explains that this private for-profit corporate mercenary organization, operated by Eric Prinz and engaged in hiring professional soldiers from around the world, operates at the behest of the U.S. government in global “hot spots,” including Iraq, and, as it turns out, New Orleans and other places around the United States. U.S. law has shielded Blackwater “employees” from government investigation – the State Department has been less than forthcoming in giving Congress any specific information about the cozy relationship between Blackwater and the executive branch. (As an aside, journalist Jeremy Scahill’s recent book Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army is a must-read for anyone interested in what’s going on in this arena.)

Step #4: Surveil Ordinary Citizens

You can’t close an open society, Wolf observes, unless you are able to “listen in” on the private conversations of ordinary citizens and intimidate, even silence, those who are most vocal in their criticism of the government. Naomi Wolf speaks to her own personal experience as an air traveler with a quadruple X designation, indicating that she is “on the watch list.” A well-meaning young airport guard clued her in after several successive flights in which she was singled out and detained for extra questioning. Might want to check your ticket next time you fly. Bottom left.

Step #5: Infiltrate Citizen Groups

Anyone who understands the history of COINTELPRO in the United States, Wolf explains, understands how this works. The FBI sends agents to infiltrate, spy on, and harass citizen groups. Congress passed laws against this sort of behavior after the Vietnam War – those laws have since been undone.

Step #6: Detain and Release Ordinary Citizens

Another intimidation tactic, Wolf notes – designed to strike fear into the general population. ‘Nuf said.

Step #7: Target Key Individuals

Wolf notes that Hitler’s propaganda minister Josef Goebbels proved particularly adept at this, according to Wolf. She points to the repercussions that followed Dan Rather and the Dixie Chicks’ criticism of the Bush administration (See the documentary “Shut Up And Sing”) as two high-profile examples, but there are many others.

Step #8: Restrict the Press

On the surface, an obvious tactic. One of Wolf’s weaknesses, however, is that she assumes the U.S. corporate press (yes, I am including the New York Times) is interested in providing a multi-sided picture of any story. With 90% of our media content ultimately owned by one of 6 multinational corporations, vital information rarely gets through the gatekeepers. If you don’t believe me, answer this simple question: How many Iraqis have been killed (estimated) since the 2003 U.S. Iraq invasion? This seems a number that should be on the tip of everyone’s brain. And yet, most Americans haven’t a clue, not because they are stupid, but because the U.S. media simply censors this sort of tough but necessary information. As a citizen of the most powerful Empire in the world, I think it is safe to say that we are generally clueless about what our own government is up to. “Disinformation” is the order of the day, if you read, watch or listen to mainstream news sources.

Step #9: Recast Criticism as Espionage and Dissent as Treason

In a closing society, Wolf suggests, you see more attempts to restrict free speech. U.S. history is full of examples, beginning with the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 (see John Adams). In our current era, the “T” word becomes more universally applied to any citizen who criticizes the U.S. government. (That’s “terrorist.”)

Step #10: Subvert the Rule of Law

More and more, Wolf suggests, the Executive branch (the President) simply ignores the Legislative branch (U.S. Congress) on those few occasions when Congress actually gets up the gumption to ask some tough questions or hold some public hearings. Have you heard about “signing statements?” Mr. Bush used them more than any other single executive in U.S. history, and they allow the president to simply reinterpret or ignore whatever Congressional laws he deems wrong-headed. Huh.

And Wolf ends the film by suggesting that a coup d’etat has occurred in October 2008, when the president deployed U.S. troops returning from Iraq to patrol U.S. soil, in direct violation of the posse comitatus act of the 1870s, designed to prohibit the president from ever using U.S. troops against U.S. citizens.

Only “the psychology of liberty” can save us, Wolf concludes, with the film suggesting we “write letters, blog, be vocal, and generally embrace a more critical form of patriotism.”

As hope for our constitutional future, this tastes like awfully thin gruel.

Maybe President Obama might save us.

But in the Q and A after the film, Wolf argued that “no American president is powerful enough to restore our Constitutional system by himself. Until every one of the laws is rescinded,” she concludes, “Our work is not done.” America’s “reverence for the law” is what is most admired globally, Wolf observed, and “the law is so fragile – it is a consensus, and if people say ‘fuck the law,’ it is difficult to restore it.”

Check out her new book Give Me Liberty for a blueprint for grassroots change.

Time will tell if Wolf’s optimistic vision of “a people’s army” rising up to reclaim our federal government and the “rule of law” comes to be reinstated.

I am not so sanguine.

The Carbon-Free Home

Now that we have celebrated, it is time to get to work (great time at the Big Picture last night).  Time for us to remember that as Americans we have been and are extremely capable of greatness.  So let’s be great once again and take actions that will enrich us.  First on that checklist is doing something about our carbon footprints.  And a great tool to help folks get started is a fairly new book called The Carbon-Free Home: 36 Remodeling Projects to Help Kick the Fossil-Fuel Habit by Stephen and Rebekah Hren. 

 

This is a great book written by folks who understand the causes of global climate change and live full and happy lives in part because they embrace a shared goal of reducing their impact on the Earth.  The book is well-written and realistically presented.  It is a great read and tremendous reference and also acknowledges and deals with the fact that not all of us are homeowners and has suggestions for renters as well.  Buy the book or get your librarian to order it and then start shredding carbon!

 

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1933392622/?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=2931884517&ref=pd_sl_5cvs4apuo_e

PARTY: Big Picture Café Hosting “Inaugurating Hope” Nonpartisan Party!

Inaugurating Hope

Inaugurating Hope

Hold the date: Tuesday, January 20 from 5:00 to 9:00 p.m. at the Big Picture Cafe and Theater!

Looking for some good food, fun, and community fare the night of the D.C. Inauguration?

Come to a free community potluck dinner and party entitled “Inaugurating Hope! A Mad River Valley Community Pot Luck Celebration.”

Billed as “a nonpartisan party to celebrate hope for our Valley’s future,” the 5:00 to 9:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 20th event is being hosted at the Big Picture Theater and Café, and will features a potluck dinner, local musicians, an informal open-mike, D.C.-streamed video from the inauguration, and local nonprofit exhibit tables full of information spotlighting local food, energy, transportation and communication initiatives.

The event is free and open to all, with a suggested donation of $6 per person, $20 per family of four or more, and $4 for senior citizens – all proceeds will go to pay for space rental, and any extra will be donated to local charities.

Interested potluck participants, please use the following information as a guide, If your last name begins with the letter in question, please bring the following item.

A-F/appetizer
G-L/salad
M-S/main dish
T-Z/drink or dessert

Please spread the word. Hope to see you there!

More information at valleyfutures.net or call 279.3364.

MRV Residents to Benefit from Energy Efficiency Program

The Mad River Valley has been selected to host a home energy savings program by Efficiency Vermont. The Vermont Community Energy Mobilization (VCEM) Pilot Project is a community-based volunteer program to help residents improve energy efficiency and save money in their homes.

The goals of the VCEM program are to recruit and train volunteers to conduct free home energy efficiency site visits in order to help home owners identify needed efficiency improvements. Efficiency Vermont will cover the costs of volunteer training and energy saving products for direct installation in the homes of program participants. Locally, the project is being spearheaded by the Valley Futures Network (VFN) energy group, the Carbon Shredders and the Mad River Valley Planning District.

“In Vermont, and particularly here in the Valley, we take care of each other, especially when times are difficult. This is the time when these kinds of actions are needed the most,” said Dennis Derryberry, chair of the VFN energy group. “This is a great opportunity to learn some skills, give back to your friends and neighbors, and cut energy use and carbon emissions in the Valley while helping others to save on their energy bills. That’s a great combination.”

A preliminary meeting to organize volunteer efforts will be held in conjunction with the VFN energy group meeting on Wednesday, January 21 starting at 6:00 PM at the Wait House in Waitsfield. Anyone interested in volunteering to help move this project forward is welcome to attend this meeting. For more information about the Jan. 21 VFN meeting please call Dennis Derryberry at 496.7662.

Local organizers hope to have 50 or more trained volunteers to conduct the home site visits. The number of trained volunteers will directly impact the number of homes that can be visited and energy saving measures implemented. Volunteer training will likely occur between early and mid- February, and attendance at that training session will be required to conduct volunteer home energy assessments. The date and location of the volunteer training session will be announced next week.

Mad River Valley residents interested in having a free energy efficiency assessment performed on their home should call Dennis Derryberry at 496.7662 or Dan Story or Erin Russell-Story at 496.2767. Efforts will be made to accommodate as many requests as program funding and volunteer resources will allow. However, the number of homes that can be visited will be somewhat limited, so preference will be given to homes showing the greatest need for energy efficiency improvements and residents demonstrating the most financial need.  All site visits and assessments are projected to be complete by mid-April.